NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
3 posters
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, this is the first ever NATO vs. Warsaw role playing strategy game the GIA have ever done. We will be following the rules posted in the topic, "Rules of NATO vs. Warsaw."
New Roosevelt as NATO in Blue
vs.
Gracania as Warsaw in Red
This will be the map for all NATO vs. Warsaw games. Please look at the instructions in the previously mentioned topic for rules and regulations of the game...
New Roosevelt as NATO in Blue
vs.
Gracania as Warsaw in Red
This will be the map for all NATO vs. Warsaw games. Please look at the instructions in the previously mentioned topic for rules and regulations of the game...
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, Gracania, just as a tester, because I didn't want to put this in the rules, how about we have a max of spending and diplomacy to 10 nations per round? If you don't like it fine, but for the first round at least I ask that you do that, as I will be doing that.
I am going to spend 5,000,000 a piece on Spain, Ireland, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, India, Pakistan, Israel, China, South Africa.
Spain - Role one
Ireland - Role two
Mexico - Role three
Panama - Role four
Australia - Role five
New Zealand - Role six
Philippines - Role seven
Israel - Role eight
South Korea - Role nine
South Africa - Role ten
I am going to spend 5,000,000 a piece on Spain, Ireland, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, India, Pakistan, Israel, China, South Africa.
Spain - Role one
Ireland - Role two
Mexico - Role three
Panama - Role four
Australia - Role five
New Zealand - Role six
Philippines - Role seven
Israel - Role eight
South Korea - Role nine
South Africa - Role ten
Last edited by New Roosevelt on Wed May 27, 2009 6:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Something must have happened. Am I doing the rolling right?
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
The member 'New Roosevelt' has done the following action : Dices roll
'Test die' : 4, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 6, 1, 5, 3
'Test die' : 4, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 6, 1, 5, 3
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, I have won the following:
Spain, Ireland, Mexico, Panama, Philippines, and Israel.
I lost -5% on Australia, New Zealand, North Korea, and South Africa.
I've got to go out tonight, so I'll do part 2 of stage one when I get back, and I'll add the updated map.
Spain, Ireland, Mexico, Panama, Philippines, and Israel.
I lost -5% on Australia, New Zealand, North Korea, and South Africa.
I've got to go out tonight, so I'll do part 2 of stage one when I get back, and I'll add the updated map.
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, I'm back. For the 2nd part of stage one, I'm going to use propaganda in Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, South Korea, South Africa, China, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala.
Brazil - 1st role
Australia - 2nd role
New Zealand - 3rd role
South Vietnam - 4th role
South Korea - 5th role
South Africa - 6th role
China - 7th role
India - 8th role
Pakistan - 9th role
Japan - 10th role
Brazil - 1st role
Australia - 2nd role
New Zealand - 3rd role
South Vietnam - 4th role
South Korea - 5th role
South Africa - 6th role
China - 7th role
India - 8th role
Pakistan - 9th role
Japan - 10th role
Last edited by New Roosevelt on Wed May 27, 2009 11:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
The member 'New Roosevelt' has done the following action : Dices roll
'Test die' : 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 1, 4, 3, 1, 3
'Test die' : 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 1, 4, 3, 1, 3
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, propaganda wins require numbers 2,3,4. So I've won in:
Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, China, India, and Japan.
I lost in South Vietnam, South Korea, South Africa, and Pakistan.
Alright these are my updated %'s of those countries:
Australia - 95%
Brazil - 65%
China - 45%
India - 50%
Japan - 65%
New Zealand - 95%
Pakistan - 45%
South Africa - 70%
South Korea - 85%
South Vietnam - 35%
I'm pretty sure that's right, now here is the updated map with my takings in part one of stage one:
Alright Gracania, go ahead. It's your turn. Let's see how well you can do against the almighty forces of DEMOCRACY!!!
Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, China, India, and Japan.
I lost in South Vietnam, South Korea, South Africa, and Pakistan.
Alright these are my updated %'s of those countries:
Australia - 95%
Brazil - 65%
China - 45%
India - 50%
Japan - 65%
New Zealand - 95%
Pakistan - 45%
South Africa - 70%
South Korea - 85%
South Vietnam - 35%
I'm pretty sure that's right, now here is the updated map with my takings in part one of stage one:
Alright Gracania, go ahead. It's your turn. Let's see how well you can do against the almighty forces of DEMOCRACY!!!
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
I'm not sure exactly on the spending front. If I wanted to spend on:
Sweden
Nicuragua
Cuba
Grenada
Laos
N. Vietnam
N. Korea
Mongolia
China
and Bhutan
how much am I spending?
N.B. I have added a Cold War die for this game
Sweden
Nicuragua
Cuba
Grenada
Laos
N. Vietnam
N. Korea
Mongolia
China
and Bhutan
how much am I spending?
N.B. I have added a Cold War die for this game
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, to make it clear. To buy a nation is the only way to incorporate them into NATO or Warsaw. BUT you can only buy them if the likely success % rate is above 75%. So for China, my propaganda was successful, so the scale tipped NATO - 45, Warsaw - 55%. So now, in order for you to win there, you must use propaganda and politics(thinking about changing name) to get it up to 75%. THEN you buy it. Does that make sense?
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
I understood that part, what I did not know was how much I had to spend on say N.Vietnam who are above 75%
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, well, I need to figure the whole money thing out. For now, there is no spent amount. It's just buying. I'll do some brainstorming for future games. That's why this is a test-run.
For now just buy nations above 75% success rate! So that means you can't buy China. But I think the others are Ok, not positive about Nicaragua. But look back over, and check those out, then you can re-do it.
For now just buy nations above 75% success rate! So that means you can't buy China. But I think the others are Ok, not positive about Nicaragua. But look back over, and check those out, then you can re-do it.
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
So I shall also spend 5,000,000 on the following:
Sweden
Nicuragua
Cuba
Grenada
Laos
N. Vietnam
N. Korea
Mongolia
Afgahnistan
and Bhutan
So I role ten die then move on to propoganda.
Sweden
Nicuragua
Cuba
Grenada
Laos
N. Vietnam
N. Korea
Mongolia
Afgahnistan
and Bhutan
So I role ten die then move on to propoganda.
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
The member 'Gracania' has done the following action : Dices roll
'Cold War die' : 4, 2, 6, 5, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6, 3
'Cold War die' : 4, 2, 6, 5, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6, 3
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
So I won in:
Sweden
Nicaragua
Cuba
Laos
N. Vietnam
and Afghanistan
But lost in:
Grenada
N. Korea
Mongolia
and Bhutan
So now I shall role ten die for propaganda in:
Yugoslavia
Norway
Austria
Bolivia
Chilie
South Vietnam (looks like Eisenhower was right about Domino theory)
Malaysia
Indonesia
Iran
and Morroco
Sweden
Nicaragua
Cuba
Laos
N. Vietnam
and Afghanistan
But lost in:
Grenada
N. Korea
Mongolia
and Bhutan
So now I shall role ten die for propaganda in:
Yugoslavia
Norway
Austria
Bolivia
Chilie
South Vietnam (looks like Eisenhower was right about Domino theory)
Malaysia
Indonesia
Iran
and Morroco
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
The member 'Gracania' has done the following action : Dices roll
'Cold War die' : 6, 5, 3, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 2, 1
'Cold War die' : 6, 5, 3, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 2, 1
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Each turn takes a few posts but we'll get there
I won in (so 5% increase):
Austria
Bolivia
Indonesia
and Iran.
Lost in (-5%):
Yugoslavia (meh Tito never liked Moscow)
Norway
Chilie
South Vietnam
Malaysia
and Morroco
I won in (so 5% increase):
Austria
Bolivia
Indonesia
and Iran.
Lost in (-5%):
Yugoslavia (meh Tito never liked Moscow)
Norway
Chilie
South Vietnam
Malaysia
and Morroco
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Yeah, not really. Democracy in BLUE shall WIN!!!
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, round two!
This phase consists of more dice rolls, but more importantly, political/diplomatic meetings:
The leaders of NATO shall be traveling to the following countries on diplomatic missions of peace:
Role one - Austria
Role two - Norway
Role three - Peru
Role four - Columbia
Role five - Brazil
Role six - China
Role seven - South Vietnam
Role eight - India
Role nine - Iraq
Role ten - South Africa
This phase consists of more dice rolls, but more importantly, political/diplomatic meetings:
The leaders of NATO shall be traveling to the following countries on diplomatic missions of peace:
Role one - Austria
Role two - Norway
Role three - Peru
Role four - Columbia
Role five - Brazil
Role six - China
Role seven - South Vietnam
Role eight - India
Role nine - Iraq
Role ten - South Africa
Last edited by New Roosevelt on Fri May 29, 2009 5:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
The member 'New Roosevelt' has done the following action : Dices roll
'Cold War die' : 6, 2, 3, 5, 2, 1, 2, 6, 2, 1
'Cold War die' : 6, 2, 3, 5, 2, 1, 2, 6, 2, 1
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Remember winning dice numbers depends on succession %'s. I win +5% in:
Austria, Norway, Brazil, China, India, Iraq.
-5% in:
Peru, Colombia, South Vietnam, South Africa.
Man, I'm feeling what LBJ felt during his term in both South Vietnam and South Africa. No matter how much help I give them, they still can't win for crap!
P.S. GOOOOOOOOO DEMOCRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!
Austria, Norway, Brazil, China, India, Iraq.
-5% in:
Peru, Colombia, South Vietnam, South Africa.
Man, I'm feeling what LBJ felt during his term in both South Vietnam and South Africa. No matter how much help I give them, they still can't win for crap!
P.S. GOOOOOOOOO DEMOCRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: NATO vs. Warsaw, New Roosevelt vs. Gracania
Alright, these are my updated %'s:
Austria - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Norway - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Brazil - NATO 70%, Warsaw 25%
China - NATO 50%, Warsaw 50%
India - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Iraq - NATO 65%, Warsaw 35%
Peru - NATO 35%, Warsaw 45%
Colombia - NATO 50%, Warsaw 35%
South Africa - NATO 65%, Warsaw 15%
South Vietnam - NATO 30%, Warsaw 55%
Honestly, wtf is wrong with South Vietnam? Do they not want to accept my help or what?
Alright Gracania, let's see what you got!
Austria - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Norway - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Brazil - NATO 70%, Warsaw 25%
China - NATO 50%, Warsaw 50%
India - NATO 55%, Warsaw 45%
Iraq - NATO 65%, Warsaw 35%
Peru - NATO 35%, Warsaw 45%
Colombia - NATO 50%, Warsaw 35%
South Africa - NATO 65%, Warsaw 15%
South Vietnam - NATO 30%, Warsaw 55%
Honestly, wtf is wrong with South Vietnam? Do they not want to accept my help or what?
Alright Gracania, let's see what you got!
New Roosevelt- King
- Posts : 496
Join date : 2009-04-17
Location : Honolulu, Hawaii
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» NATA vs. Warsaw Anyone up for a 1v1 test run?
» Rules and Regulations of NATO vs. Warsaw
» Partition of India, Gracania, Citrustan, and New Roosevelt
» The Federation of New Roosevelt
» 2305 Election in New Roosevelt
» Rules and Regulations of NATO vs. Warsaw
» Partition of India, Gracania, Citrustan, and New Roosevelt
» The Federation of New Roosevelt
» 2305 Election in New Roosevelt
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|